Search This Blog

Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Human Accomplishment

Who were the most important inventors and artists from 850 BC to 1950?

How many are there?

How would you choose?

What could you learn from a list of these achievers and what they accomplished?

Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C to 1950 by Charles Murray, answers these questions and a lot more.

Murray researches as many lists of achievement as he can find, develops ways to select the best, and creates a method for quantifying the results.

A point of the book is to demonstrate the scientific method, one of the key human accomplishments, showing how he developed his hypothesis, how he investigated and researched the validity of the hypothesis, and what he discovered.

Since he expects to be attacked for stampeding sacred cows, he shows what happens when he uses alternative models. Turns out there wasn’t much difference.

When quantifying importance and volume, he introduces the Lotka Curve, which shows that there is not much traffic on the extra mile. No matter how you stack the research, the same players are recognized as the greats of their game.

Larry and I spent a lot of time together reading the lists of significant accomplishments and significant achievers. Larry is my Android buddy when I need to learn something or check facts, “Okay, Larry, now...” and I get more explanation and context.

There were a lot of people and accomplishments I already knew, and there were a lot I didn’t know, both of which made the book rewarding.

Many of the top creators were polymaths, casually brilliant in two, three, four, or five fields. My favorite was the story Michelangelo, who opened up a whole new toolbox of painting technologies while making the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, and is recognized as a much better sculptor than painter. May I carry your bag, Mr. Buonarroti ?

Art is a series of innovations, some were single, some were a school, some were national branches, but they were largely independent triumphs. Science and technology, on the other hand, are globally cumulative. Innovation occurs by picking up where the last guy left off, from Mr. Newton's shoulders.

4,002 inventors over 2,750 years could be a stately pace. But it wasn't. Murray investigates a range of circumstances that help and hinder human accomplishment. He has some enlightening observations about the political, educational, financial, philosophical,  and organizational infrastructures that accompanied human accomplishment, too many examples to be coincidence.

As I was luxuriating through Human Accomplishment, I kept thinking, “What an education!” I like quick and to the point. Here is a context for art, technology, and science I had never learned before.

However, I have since realized that Human Accomplishment is not an education. Human Accomplishment is the inventory or subject matter for the education. Reading and understanding the book is the education.

Not a difficult book to read, an awesome book to understand.

While you're forming your comment, here are some good ideas About Work.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

Letters To A Young Scientist

Have you ever been called to give advice to someone just starting their career?

Heck, have you ever considered giving yourself a career checkup?

Letters To A Young Scientist by Pulitzer Prize winning author Edward O. Wilson is a delight. Twenty one “letters” (actually each is more focused than a letter, how about a great blog post?) shows how the author got into the science business, the coming importance of science and technology, how to work constructively, where career growth comes from, and mathematics.

Wilson is concerned that too many pre-scientists are scared off early by math bullies, who convince them they don’t know, can’t know enough math to be professional. He’s not against mathematics, just against using math as an early disqualifying tool.

As he sees it, most of research is data collection. After the data is collected and the hypothesis stated, there is some room for someone with a math toolbox” to assist. A researcher can call on just about any mathematician to get his math.

However, a mathematician without field data to work on is a theorist, scribbling on the white board.

Then magnanimously, Wilson identifies the scientific fields where theoretical math is most valuable.

I have read and watch enough misused math to know that No Matter How Hard You Do The Wrong Thing, It Never Quite Works.

How to pick a career? Start with your passion. That will make it easier to fill in your education. Ph.D.s without a passion have a hard road.

Don’t be afraid to jump to a new passion when it comes along, usually as part of investigating/developing your current passion. Hit hard every swing. Time’s awastin’

New work comes from what you discover in your current work, enlarging, creating context, joining knowledge, creating new opportunities.

This is a book that builds confidence to quit worrying and start doing.

I wish I belonged to a book club where we could give each letter its own session. This book is that good.

Read Letters To A Young Scientist and then give it to someone you love.

Junior AcademySource of the Future!